| |
PURPOSE |
ORGANIZATION |
SUPPORTING DETAILS |
IN ASSESSING,
CONSIDER . . .
|
the degree to which the writers response
- establishes and maintains a clear purpose/thesis
- demonstrates an awareness of audience and task
- attempts compositional risk
|
the degree to which the writers response
illustrates
- unity · transition
- coherence
- opening/introduction
- closing/conclusion
|
the degree to which the supporting details
(examples, facts, anecdotes, direct quotations, metaphors, allusions, and imagery):
- are appropriate for the writers purpose
- support the main point of the writers response
|
SUPERIOR
|
- establishes and maintains a clear purpose/thesis
- demonstrates a clear understanding of audience
- and task
- exhibits ideals that are developed in depth
|
- organized from beginning to end
- logical progression of ideas through use of transition
- fluent, cohesive
- clear focus
|
- supporting details are effective, vivid, explicit, and/or pertinent
|
STRONG
|
- establishes a purpose/thesis
- demonstrates an awareness of audience and task
- develops ideas, but they may be limited in depth
|
- organized, but may have minor lapses in unity or coherence
- transition evident
- clear focus
|
- supporting details are elaborate and appropriate
|
ADEQUATE
|
- attempts to establish a purpose/thesis
- demonstrates some awareness of audience and task
- exhibits rudimentary development of ideas
|
- Inconsistent in unity and/or coherence poor transitions
- usually has clear focus
|
- supporting details lack elaboration or are repetitious
|
LIMITED
|
- does not establish a clear purpose/thesis
- demonstrates minimal awareness of audience and task
- lacks clarity of ideas
|
- shift in point of view
- serious errors in organization
- thought patterns difficult or impossible to follow
- lacks introduction and/or conclusion
- no transitions · no clear focus
|
- supporting details are random, inappropriate, or barely apparent
|
INADEQUATE
|
- does not attempt to establish a purpose/thesis
- demonstrates no awareness of audience and task
|
- no organization evident
- no clear focus
- incoherence
|
- supporting details are missing
|
|
VOICE / TONE |
USAGE, MECHANICS, GRAMMAR |
IN ASSESSING,
CONSIDER . . .
|
the degree to which the writers response
reflects
- personal commitment
- personal expression and is appropriate to the writers purpose
|
the degree to which the writers response
exhibits correct · usage (tense formation, agreement, word
choice); · mechanics (spelling, capitalization, punctuation,
grammar); · sentence structure and variety as appropriate to
the piece and grade level |
SUPERIOR |
- distinctive voice evident
- tone enhances personal expression
|
- precision and/or sophistication in syntax
- very few, if any, errors
|
STRONG |
- evidence of voice
- tone appropriate for writers purpose
|
- variety in syntax
- few errors
|
ADEQUATE
|
- evidence of beginning sense of voice
- some evidence of appropriate tone
|
- some variety in syntax
- some errors that do not interfere with meaning
|
LIMITED |
- little voice evident
- tone absent or inappropriate for writers purpose
|
- little variety in syntax
- multiple errors and/or patterns of errors are evident
|
INADEQUATE |
- no voice
- tone absent or inappropriate for writers purpose
|
- assortment of incomplete and/or incorrect sentences
- Errors so severe that they detract form meaning
|